
I'm quite interested in the 1999 case that involved an African-American woman by the name of Sophia Stewart, and the Wachowski Brothers, The Matrix, The Terminator, and Warner Brothers. If you know nothing about this case, you shouldn't, because it was barely, if at all, reported on by the mainstream media. As a matter of fact, I only came across this case by word of mouth.
Here's the deal: In 1999, Stewart filed a lawsuit against Warner Brothers (film studio that released The Matrix), the Wachowski Brothers (the directors of The Matrix) and Joel Silver (producer), claiming that The Matrix was plagiarized from her book, The Third Eye. She lost her case after failing to appear in court for preliminary hearings, but her apparent negligence does not dissuade me from buying into her story. I do think there was some shadiness on the part of Warner Brothers, and, I'll be frank, I do believe both race and gender played a role in the downplay of this case and the unwillingness of many to grant it any credibility. Not to mention, as Stewart says, Warner Brothers is owned by AOL-Time Warner, which owns 95% of all media. There's no way a case disputing authorship - by a colored woman! - of one of a studio's most megalicious blockbuster hits would be reported on by that studio's parent company.
To me, the glaring problem (for many people that counted in this matter) is that Sophia Stewart wrote a manuscript that, not only a black person, but a black woman (double whammy!) had no business writing. Black women simply aren't supposed to pen work on the cerebral, intellectual, and philosophical level of The Matrix or, for that matter, The Terminator. Consider this quote by Sophia:
"When you read "The Third Eye", you will see it's all one story [The Matrix and The Terminator]. You have to understand I am very subtle with the way I write, I work on the subliminal. When I write I don't want people to be able to tell my race or gender. Look at Octavia Butler the most famous black female science fiction writer they never put her work on the big screen. "
And I think that is exactly what the problem was - the manuscript did not dictate the "race" and "gender" of its author as "black" and "woman." Ooops. Hollywood isn't interested in "minorities" doing anything too ambitious, but if they do, they are to do so with the assistance of the "majority," or simply majority opinion. You know, they just have to make the story more consumable for the American public.
It is no secret that Hollywood, for all its progressive showboating, is racially biased and culturally confused. I can't tell you more than ten "minority" actors and actresses, let alone "minority" screenwriters and directors, that are consistently designated important spaces on the big screen (the obligatory biographical role set aside). Hollywood, to say the least, is terrified of color unless it's placed in a certain, comfortable context.
I don't care how many more times Halle Berry or Penelope Cruz win an Oscar, and how often Hollywood puts on a puppet show to appease its cultural critics - the real test of whether or not Hollywood can relieve itself of its racial ignorance and fears will only be revealed in the positions it allots to people of color off screen, such as that of director and writer, and in stories that do not create Wikipediaed or Googled microcosms of their culture and narratives.
**To continue reading, click
here.